Draft Forbes Group Website (Build by Nikola). The official site is hosted at:
License: GPL3
ubuntu2004
Single Particle in a Box
We start with a model of a single particle in a periodic box (Section III.A from [Kempe:2003]). Equation numbers correspond to [Kempe:2003.] The wavefunction is then simply a vector on our set of abscissa. This wavefunction lives in our original Hilbert space spanned by the basis of "position" eigenstates such that ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \abs at position 1: \̲a̲b̲s̲{\braket{\psi|n… is the probability that the particle is on the th run of the ladder. The full quantum random walk problem lives in an axuilliary Hilbert space where is a two-dimensional Hilbert space spanned by two spin states , . The idea here is that motion up the ladder corresponds with being in the spin state while motion down the ladder corresponds to . The unitary evolution operator is thus:
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \mat at position 18: …egin{gather} \̲m̲a̲t̲{S} = \ket{\ua}…Now we start from the state and evolve with the unitary evolution operator:
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: Undefined control sequence: \mat at position 1: \̲m̲a̲t̲{U} = \mat{S}\c…Doing this 100 times, we obtain Fig. 5 from [Kempe:2003].
Starting from a symmetric initial condition we obtain Fig. 6. (It appears they forgot to normalize the initial state properly.)
MMF Note: Using the coin from (17) does not seem to give symmetric evolution like they claim... not sure why.
Let's look at the evolution now, anticipating a comparison with [Dadras:2018].
One can get a biased quantum walk by starting from a different initial state, or by using a different coin. In [Dadras:2018] they use a different coin. Try to reproduce their Fig. 2.