Proposition22.1
If $F$ is a finite field, then the characteristic of $F$ is $p\text{,}$ where $p$ is prime.
📚 The CoCalc Library - books, templates and other resources
Important: to view this notebook properly you will need to execute the cell above, which assumes you have an Internet connection. It should already be selected, or place your cursor anywhere above to select. Then press the "Run" button in the menu bar above (the right-pointing arrowhead), or press Shift-Enter on your keyboard.
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: \newcommand{\lt} attempting to redefine \lt; use \renewcommand
Recall that a field $F$ has $p$ if $p$ is the smallest positive integer such that for every nonzero element $\alpha$ in $F\text{,}$ we have $p \alpha = 0\text{.}$ If no such integer exists, then $F$ has characteristic 0. From Theorem 16.19 we know that $p$ must be prime. Suppose that $F$ is a finite field with $n$ elements. Then $n \alpha = 0$ for all $\alpha$ in $F\text{.}$ Consequently, the characteristic of $F$ must be $p\text{,}$ where $p$ is a prime dividing $n\text{.}$ This discussion is summarized in the following proposition.
If $F$ is a finite field, then the characteristic of $F$ is $p\text{,}$ where $p$ is prime.
Throughout this chapter we will assume that $p$ is a prime number unless otherwise stated.
If $F$ is a finite field of characteristic $p\text{,}$ then the order of $F$ is $p^n$ for some $n \in {\mathbb N}\text{.}$
Let $\phi : {\mathbb Z} \rightarrow F$ be the ring homomorphism defined by $\phi(n) = n \cdot 1\text{.}$ Since the characteristic of $F$ is $p\text{,}$ the kernel of $\phi$ must be $p {\mathbb Z}$ and the image of $\phi$ must be a subfield of $F$ isomorphic to ${\mathbb Z}_p\text{.}$ We will denote this subfield by $K\text{.}$ Since $F$ is a finite field, it must be a finite extension of $K$ and, therefore, an algebraic extension of $K\text{.}$ Suppose that $[F : K] = n$ is the dimension of $F\text{,}$ where $F$ is a $K$ vector space. There must exist elements $\alpha_1, \ldots, \alpha_n \in F$ such that any element $\alpha$ in $F$ can be written uniquely in the form
where the $a_i$'s are in $K\text{.}$ Since there are $p$ elements in $K\text{,}$ there are $p^n$ possible linear combinations of the $\alpha_i$'s. Therefore, the order of $F$ must be $p^n\text{.}$
Let $p$ be prime and $D$ be an integral domain of characteristic $p\text{.}$ Then
for all positive integers $n\text{.}$
We will prove this lemma using mathematical induction on $n\text{.}$ We can use the binomial formula (see Chapter 2, Example 2.4) to verify the case for $n = 1\text{;}$ that is,
If $0 \lt k \lt p\text{,}$ then
must be divisible by $p\text{,}$ since $p$ cannot divide $k!(p - k)!\text{.}$ Note that $D$ is an integral domain of characteristic $p\text{,}$ so all but the first and last terms in the sum must be zero. Therefore, $(a + b)^p = a^p + b^p\text{.}$
Now suppose that the result holds for all $k\text{,}$ where $1 \leq k \leq n\text{.}$ By the induction hypothesis,
Therefore, the lemma is true for $n + 1$ and the proof is complete.
Let $F$ be a field. A polynomial $f(x) \in F[x]$ of degree $n$ is if it has $n$ distinct roots in the splitting field of $f(x)\text{;}$ that is, $f(x)$ is separable when it factors into distinct linear factors over the splitting field of $f\text{.}$ An extension $E$ of $F$ is a of $F$ if every element in $E$ is the root of a separable polynomial in $F[x]\text{.}$
The polynomial $x^2 - 2$ is separable over ${\mathbb Q}$ since it factors as $(x - \sqrt{2}\, )(x + \sqrt{2}\, )\text{.}$ In fact, ${\mathbb Q}(\sqrt{2}\, )$ is a separable extension of ${\mathbb Q}\text{.}$ Let $\alpha = a + b \sqrt{2}$ be any element in ${\mathbb Q}(\sqrt{2}\, )\text{.}$ If $b = 0\text{,}$ then $\alpha$ is a root of $x - a\text{.}$ If $b \neq 0\text{,}$ then $\alpha$ is the root of the separable polynomial
Fortunately, we have an easy test to determine the separability of any polynomial. Let
be any polynomial in $F[x]\text{.}$ Define the of $f(x)$ to be
Let $F$ be a field and $f(x) \in F[x]\text{.}$ Then $f(x)$ is separable if and only if $f(x)$ and $f'(x)$ are relatively prime.
Let $f(x)$ be separable. Then $f(x)$ factors over some extension field of $F$ as $f(x) = (x - \alpha_1) (x - \alpha_2) \cdots (x - \alpha_n)\text{,}$ where $\alpha_i \neq \alpha_j$ for $i \neq j\text{.}$ Taking the derivative of $f(x)\text{,}$ we see that
Hence, $f(x)$ and $f'(x)$ can have no common factors.
To prove the converse, we will show that the contrapositive of the statement is true. Suppose that $f(x) = (x - \alpha)^k g(x)\text{,}$ where $k \gt 1\text{.}$ Differentiating, we have
Therefore, $f(x)$ and $f'(x)$ have a common factor.
For every prime $p$ and every positive integer $n\text{,}$ there exists a finite field $F$ with $p^n$ elements. Furthermore, any field of order $p^n$ is isomorphic to the splitting field of $x^{p^n} -x$ over ${\mathbb Z}_p\text{.}$
Let $f(x) = x^{p^n} - x$ and let $F$ be the splitting field of $f(x)\text{.}$ Then by Lemma 22.5, $f(x)$ has $p^n$ distinct zeros in $F\text{,}$ since $f'(x) = p^n x^{p^n - 1} - 1 = -1$ is relatively prime to $f(x)\text{.}$ We claim that the roots of $f(x)$ form a subfield of $F\text{.}$ Certainly 0 and 1 are zeros of $f(x)\text{.}$ If $\alpha$ and $\beta$ are zeros of $f(x)\text{,}$ then $\alpha + \beta$ and $\alpha \beta$ are also zeros of $f(x)\text{,}$ since $\alpha^{p^n} + \beta^{p^n} = (\alpha + \beta)^{p^n}$ and $\alpha^{p^n} \beta^{p^n} = (\alpha \beta)^{p^n}\text{.}$ We also need to show that the additive inverse and the multiplicative inverse of each root of $f(x)$ are roots of $f(x)\text{.}$ For any zero $\alpha$ of $f(x)\text{,}$ we know that $-\alpha$ is also a zero of $f(x)\text{,}$ since
provided $p$ is odd. If $p = 2\text{,}$ then
If $\alpha \neq 0\text{,}$ then $(\alpha^{-1})^{p^n} = (\alpha^{p^n})^{-1} = \alpha^{-1}\text{.}$ Since the zeros of $f(x)$ form a subfield of $F$ and $f(x)$ splits in this subfield, the subfield must be all of $F\text{.}$
Let $E$ be any other field of order $p^n\text{.}$ To show that $E$ is isomorphic to $F\text{,}$ we must show that every element in $E$ is a root of $f(x)\text{.}$ Certainly 0 is a root of $f(x)\text{.}$ Let $\alpha$ be a nonzero element of $E\text{.}$ The order of the multiplicative group of nonzero elements of $E$ is $p^n-1\text{;}$ hence, $\alpha^{p^n-1} =1$ or $\alpha^{p^n} -\alpha = 0\text{.}$ Since $E$ contains $p^n$ elements, $E$ must be a splitting field of $f(x)\text{;}$ however, by Corollary 21.34, the splitting field of any polynomial is unique up to isomorphism.
The unique finite field with $p^n$ elements is called the of order $p^n\text{.}$ We will denote this field by $\gf(p^n)\text{.}$
Every subfield of the Galois field $\gf(p^n)$ has $p^m$ elements, where $m$ divides $n\text{.}$ Conversely, if $m \mid n$ for $m \gt 0\text{,}$ then there exists a unique subfield of $\gf(p^n)$ isomorphic to $\gf(p^m)\text{.}$
Let $F$ be a subfield of $E = \gf(p^n)\text{.}$ Then $F$ must be a field extension of $K$ that contains $p^m$ elements, where $K$ is isomorphic to ${\mathbb Z}_p\text{.}$ Then $m \mid n\text{,}$ since $[E:K] = [E:F][F:K]\text{.}$
To prove the converse, suppose that $m \mid n$ for some $m \gt 0\text{.}$ Then $p^m -1$ divides $p^n -1\text{.}$ Consequently, $x^{p^m -1} - 1$ divides $x^{p^n -1} -1\text{.}$ Therefore, $x^{p^m} - x$ must divide $x^{p^n} - x\text{,}$ and every zero of $x^{p^m} - x$ is also a zero of $x^{p^n} - x\text{.}$ Thus, $\gf(p^n)$ contains, as a subfield, a splitting field of $x^{p^m} - x\text{,}$ which must be isomorphic to $\gf(p^m)\text{.}$
The lattice of subfields of $\gf(p^{24})$ is given in Figure 22.9.
With each field $F$ we have a multiplicative group of nonzero elements of $F$ which we will denote by $F^*\text{.}$ The multiplicative group of any finite field is cyclic. This result follows from the more general result that we will prove in the next theorem.
If $G$ is a finite subgroup of $F^\ast\text{,}$ the multiplicative group of nonzero elements of a field $F\text{,}$ then $G$ is cyclic.
Let $G$ be a finite subgroup of $F^\ast$ of order $n\text{.}$ By the Fundamental Theorem of Finite Abelian Groups (Theorem 13.4),
where $n = p_1^{e_1} \cdots p_k^{e_k}$ and the $p_1, \ldots, p_k$ are (not necessarily distinct) primes. Let $m$ be the least common multiple of $p_1^{e_1}, \ldots, p_k^{e_k}\text{.}$ Then $G$ contains an element of order $m\text{.}$ Since every $\alpha$ in $G$ satisfies $x^r - 1$ for some $r$ dividing $m\text{,}$ $\alpha$ must also be a root of $x^m - 1\text{.}$ Since $x^m -1$ has at most $m$ roots in $F\text{,}$ $n \leq m\text{.}$ On the other hand, we know that $m \leq |G|\text{;}$ therefore, $m = n\text{.}$ Thus, $G$ contains an element of order $n$ and must be cyclic.
The multiplicative group of all nonzero elements of a finite field is cyclic.
Every finite extension $E$ of a finite field $F$ is a simple extension of $F\text{.}$
Let $\alpha$ be a generator for the cyclic group $E^{\ast}$ of nonzero elements of $E\text{.}$ Then $E = F( \alpha )\text{.}$
The finite field $\gf(2^4)$ is isomorphic to the field ${\mathbb Z}_2/ \langle 1 + x + x^4 \rangle\text{.}$ Therefore, the elements of $\gf(2^4)$ can be taken to be
Remembering that $1 + \alpha +\alpha^4 = 0\text{,}$ we add and multiply elements of $\gf(2^4)$ exactly as we add and multiply polynomials. The multiplicative group of $\gf(2^4)$ is isomorphic to ${\mathbb Z}_{15}$ with generator $\alpha\text{:}$