Example13.11
Any series of subgroups of an abelian group is a normal series. Consider the following series of groups:
📚 The CoCalc Library - books, templates and other resources
Important: to view this notebook properly you will need to execute the cell above, which assumes you have an Internet connection. It should already be selected, or place your cursor anywhere above to select. Then press the "Run" button in the menu bar above (the right-pointing arrowhead), or press Shift-Enter on your keyboard.
ParseError: KaTeX parse error: \newcommand{\lt} attempting to redefine \lt; use \renewcommand
A of a group $G$ is a finite sequence of subgroups
where $H_i$ is a normal subgroup of $H_{i+1}\text{.}$ If each subgroup $H_i$ is normal in $G\text{,}$ then the series is called a . The of a subnormal or normal series is the number of proper inclusions.
Any series of subgroups of an abelian group is a normal series. Consider the following series of groups:
A subnormal series need not be a normal series. Consider the following subnormal series of the group $D_4\text{:}$
The subgroup $\{ (1), (12)(34) \}$ is not normal in $D_4\text{;}$ consequently, this series is not a normal series.
A subnormal (normal) series $\{ K_j \}$ is a $\{ H_i \}$ if $\{ H_i \} \subset \{ K_j \}\text{.}$ That is, each $H_i$ is one of the $K_j\text{.}$
The series
is a refinement of the series
The best way to study a subnormal or normal series of subgroups, $\{ H_i \}$ of $G\text{,}$ is actually to study the factor groups $H_{i+1}/H_i\text{.}$ We say that two subnormal (normal) series $\{H_i \}$ and $\{ K_j \}$ of a group $G$ are if there is a one-to-one correspondence between the collections of factor groups $\{H_{i+1}/H_i \}$ and $\{ K_{j+1}/ K_j \}\text{.}$
The two normal series
of the group ${\mathbb Z}_{60}$ are isomorphic since
A subnormal series $\{ H_i \}$ of a group $G$ is a if all the factor groups are simple; that is, if none of the factor groups of the series contains a normal subgroup. A normal series $\{ H_i \}$ of $G$ is a if all the factor groups are simple.
The group ${\mathbb Z}_{60}$ has a composition series
with factor groups
Since ${\mathbb Z}_{60}$ is an abelian group, this series is automatically a principal series. Notice that a composition series need not be unique. The series
is also a composition series.
For $n \geq 5\text{,}$ the series
is a composition series for $S_n$ since $S_n / A_n \cong {\mathbb Z}_2$ and $A_n$ is simple.
Not every group has a composition series or a principal series. Suppose that
is a subnormal series for the integers under addition. Then $H_1$ must be of the form $k {\mathbb Z}$ for some $k \in {\mathbb N}\text{.}$ In this case $H_1 / H_0 \cong k {\mathbb Z}$ is an infinite cyclic group with many nontrivial proper normal subgroups.
Although composition series need not be unique as in the case of ${\mathbb Z}_{60}\text{,}$ it turns out that any two composition series are related. The factor groups of the two composition series for ${\mathbb Z}_{60}$ are ${\mathbb Z}_2\text{,}$ ${\mathbb Z}_2\text{,}$ ${\mathbb Z}_3\text{,}$ and ${\mathbb Z}_5\text{;}$ that is, the two composition series are isomorphic. The Jordan-Hölder Theorem says that this is always the case.
Any two composition series of $G$ are isomorphic.
We shall employ mathematical induction on the length of the composition series. If the length of a composition series is 1, then $G$ must be a simple group. In this case any two composition series are isomorphic.
Suppose now that the theorem is true for all groups having a composition series of length $k\text{,}$ where $1 \leq k \lt n\text{.}$ Let
be two composition series for $G\text{.}$ We can form two new subnormal series for $G$ since $H_i \cap K_{m-1}$ is normal in $H_{i+1} \cap K_{m-1}$ and $K_j \cap H_{n-1}$ is normal in $K_{j+1} \cap H_{n-1}\text{:}$
Since $H_i \cap K_{m-1}$ is normal in $H_{i+1} \cap K_{m-1}\text{,}$ the Second Isomorphism Theorem (Theorem 11.12) implies that
where $H_i$ is normal in $H_i (H_{i+1} \cap K_{m-1})\text{.}$ Since $\{ H_i \}$ is a composition series, $H_{i+1} / H_i$ must be simple; consequently, $H_i (H_{i+1} \cap K_{m-1})/ H_i$ is either $H_{i+1}/H_i$ or $H_i/H_i\text{.}$ That is, $H_i (H_{i+1} \cap K_{m-1})$ must be either $H_i$ or $H_{i+1}\text{.}$ Removing any nonproper inclusions from the series
we have a composition series for $H_{n-1}\text{.}$ Our induction hypothesis says that this series must be equivalent to the composition series
Hence, the composition series
and
are equivalent. If $H_{n-1} = K_{m-1}\text{,}$ then the composition series $\{H_i \}$ and $\{ K_j \}$ are equivalent and we are done; otherwise, $H_{n-1} K_{m-1}$ is a normal subgroup of $G$ properly containing $H_{n-1}\text{.}$ In this case $H_{n-1} K_{m-1} = G$ and we can apply the Second Isomorphism Theorem once again; that is,
Therefore,
and
are equivalent and the proof of the theorem is complete.
A group $G$ is if it has a subnormal series $\{ H_i \}$ such that all of the factor groups $H_{i+1} / H_i$ are abelian. Solvable groups will play a fundamental role when we study Galois theory and the solution of polynomial equations.
The group $S_4$ is solvable since
has abelian factor groups; however, for $n \geq 5$ the series
is a composition series for $S_n$ with a nonabelian factor group. Therefore, $S_n$ is not a solvable group for $n \geq 5\text{.}$